Our authors

Our Books
More than 875 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Four-page briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online library

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 90 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Online library on integrity in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

M.6. The perpetrator intended to use such person or persons as instruments or tools to commit the relevant crime.

In the Katanga Trial Judgement, the Trial Chamber held that:

"As aforementioned, to incur criminal responsibility as an indirect perpetrator, the accused must, inter alia, meet the mental elements laid down in article 30 of the Statute and, as the case may be, any mental elements specific to the crime at issue, and furthermore, must have been aware of the factual circumstances which allow his or her exertion of control over the crime.

In addition to satisfying the mental elements set forth in article 30 and the intent specific to certain crimes - ingredients whose contours are delineated above - the Chamber further considered that indirect commission requires the perpetrator’s awareness of the factual circumstances which allow him or her to exert control over the crime. In accordance with the constituent elements of indirect commission which it identified, and recalling in this respect that the control exerted over a crime committed through one or more other persons may take several forms, the Chamber acknowledges that an accused’s awareness of the exertion of control may also assume various forms.

Stated otherwise, the indirect perpetrator must be in a position of awareness of the ingredients fundamental to his or her exertion of control over the crime, given that they depend on the form of indirect commission involved. Accordingly, in the present case and since indirect commission through control over the organisation is at issue, the Chamber will satisfy itself that when exerting such control, the indirect perpetrator was aware of the position he or she held within the organisation and the essential features of the organisation which secured the aforementioned functional automatism."[36]

Footnotes:

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 555 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online library

Power in international justice
Online library on power in international justice

Interviewing
An online library