Table of contents:
P.36. Evidence inferred from a utterance, a document or a deed.
P.36.1. Evidence of subjecting one or more persons to forced nudity.
P.36.2. Evidence of forcing a person or persons to perform exercices naked in public.
P.36.3. Evidence of forcing a person or persons to march around naked in public.
P.36.4. Evidence of forcing a person or persons to dance and strip naked in public.
P.36.5. Evidence of forcing a person or persons to bathe the perpetrator.
P.36.6. Evidence of forcing one or more persons to have sexual intercourse.
P.36.7. Evidence of forcing one or more persons to commit incest.
P.36.8. Evidence of forcing one or more persons to dress in provocative clothing.
Element:
P.36. Evidence inferred from a utterance, a document or a deed.
P.36.1. Evidence of subjecting one or more persons to forced nudity.
P.36.2. Evidence offorcing a person or persons to perform exercices naked in public.
P.36.3. Evidence offorcing a person or persons to march around naked in public.
A. Legal source/authority and evidence:
[B. Evidentiary comment:]
P.36.4. Evidence of forcing a person or persons to dance and strip naked in public.
A. Legal source/authority and evidence:
Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac et al., Cases No. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T, Judgement (TC), 22 February 2001, paras. 768-769:
[B. Evidentiary comment:]
P.36.5. Evidence of forcing a person or persons to bathe the perpetrator.
P.36.6. Evidence of forcing one or more persons to have sexual intercourse.
P.36.7. Evidence of forcing one or more persons to commit incest.
A. Legal source/authority and evidence:
Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalić et al., Case No. IT-96-21-T, Judgement (TC), 16 November 1998, paras. 1065-1066:
[B. Evidentiary comment:]
P.36.8. Evidence of forcing one or more persons to dress in provocative clothing.
