Our authors

Our Books
More than 875 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Four-page briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online library

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 80 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Online library on integrity in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

5.b.i. [Mental element for Element 3] [Consequence of depriving one or more persons of biological reproductive capacity:] The perpetrator meant to cause the consequence of deprivation of one or more persons of biological reproductive capacity; OR

P.8. Evidence inferred from an utterance, a document, or a deed.

P.8.1. Evidence that the perpetrator participated in organising an enforced sterilization program.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al., Case No. 5, Judgement (Military Tribunal No. I), 20 August 1947, reproduced in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Proceedings, Vol. 2 (1949-53), p. 279:

“Brack’s part in the organisation of the sterilization program with full knowledge that it would be put into execution is conclusively shown by the record.”

B. [Evidentiary comment:]

P.8.2. Evidence that the perpetrator participated in the preparation of plans for enforced sterilization.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al., Case No. 5, Judgement (Military Tribunal No. I), 20 August 1947, reproduced in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Proceedings, Vol. 2 (1949-53), p. 223-226::

“RUDOLF BRANDT

Under counts two and three of the indictment the defendant Rudolf Brandt is charged with special responsibility for, and participation in, […]Sterilization […] Experiments.

[…]

In reference to the X-ray and surgery methods of sterilization, however, Rudolf Brandt is shown by the evidence to have taken a moving part in the preparation of plans, and in their execution, sufficient to justify the Tribunal in finding his criminal connection therewith.

[…]

It goes without saying that the work done in conformity with the plans of Himmler, substantially aided by the co-operation of Rudolf Brandt, brought maiming and suffering to great numbers of people.”

“GEBHARDT:

[…]

STERILIZATION EXPERIMENTS

[…]

On 7 and 8 July 1942 a conference took place between Himmler, Gebhardt, SS Brigadefuehrer Gluecks, and SS Brigadefuehrer Clauberg, to discuss the sterilization of Jewesses. Dr. Clauberg was promised that the Auschwitz concentration camp would be placed at his disposal for experiments on human beings and animals, and he was requested to discover by means of fundamental experiments a method of sterilizing persons without their knowledge.”

B. [Evidentiary comment:]

P.9. Evidence inferred from a circumstance.

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 530 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online library

Power in international justice
Online library on power in international justice

Interviewing
An online library