Our authors

Our Books
More than 875 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Four-page briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online library

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 90 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Online library on integrity in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

8.a. [Mental element for element 3] [Conduct of directing an attack:]The perpetrator meant to engage in directing an attack.

P.38. Evidence inferred from an utterance, a document, or a deed.

P.38.1. Evidence of an armed attack.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 649:

“55.In a resolution on Somalia adopted in 1994, the UN Security Council condemned “violence and armed attacks against persons engaged in … peace-keeping efforts” and re-emphasised the importance it attached to “the safety and security of United Nations and other personnel engaged in … peacekeeping throughout Somalia48”.

“48UN Security Council, Res. 897, 4 February 1994, Preamble.”

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.2. Evidence of beating and killing.

P.38.3. Evidence of placing a bomb.

P.38.4. Evidence of destroying property.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 635:

“343. In a resolution adopted in 1999 on the safety and security of humanitarian personnel and protection of UN personnel, the UN General Assembly strongly condemned “acts of destruction and looting” of the property of those participating in humanitarian operations.347 The General Assembly urged all states “to take the necessary measures … to respect and ensure respect for the inviolability of United Nations premises”.348”

“347 UN General Assembly, Res. 54/192, 17 December 1999, preamble.

348 UN General Assembly, Res. 55/92, 17 December 1999, §2.”

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.5. Evidence of placing mines.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Commentary on the Additionnal Protocols of 8 June 1997 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, para.1081:

“During the above-mentionned enquiry the question arose whether the placing of mines constituted an attack. The general feeling was that there is an attack whenever a person is directly endangered by a mine laid”.

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.6. Evidence of firing a missile.

P.38.7. Evidence of a sniper shooting a peacekeeper.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 654:

“89. In 1995, in a statement by its President following the fatal shooting of a French peacekeeper by a sniper in Sarajevo, the UN Security Council condemned “in the strongest terms such acts direct at peace-keepers who are serving the cause of peace in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina” and reiterated that such attacks “should not remain unpunished”.87”

“87UN Security Council, Statement by the President, UN Doc. S/PRST/1995/, 14 April 1995.”

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.38.8. Evidence of firing at humanitarian aid assistance workers or peacekeepers.

P.38.9. Evidence of planning the abduction of peacekeepers and humanitarian assistance workers.

P.38.10. Evidence of planning the detention of peacekeepers and humanitarian assistance workers.

A. Legal source/authority and evidence:

ICRC, Study on Customary Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Volume II: Practice, Part I (2005), p. 649:

“In a resolution adopted in 1994 in the context of the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the UN Security Council condemned “the harassment and the detention of UNPROFOR personnel by the Bosnian Serb forces and all obstacles to UNPROFOR’s freedom of movement”.52”

“52 UN Security Council, Res. 913, 22 April 1994, Preamble.”

[B. Evidentiary comment:]

P.39. Evidence inferred from a circumstance.

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 555 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online library

Power in international justice
Online library on power in international justice

Interviewing
An online library