M.5. The perpetrator was aware that he did not completely or voluntarily give up the criminal intent.

M.5. The perpetrator was aware that he did not completely or voluntarily give up the criminal intent.

Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-T, Public Redacted Version of Judgement Issued on 24 March 2016 – Volume I of IV (TC), 24 March 2016, para. 571:

''571. To be found criminally responsible for planning under the Statute, the accused––either acting alone or with another––must have designed criminal conduct that is later carried out and which constitutes one or more crimes enumerated in the Statute. The planning must have been a factor substantially contributing to the criminal conduct, but the Prosecution need not establish that the crime would not have been committed but for the accused’s plan. The accused must intend to plan the commission of a crime or, at a minimum, must be aware of the substantial likelihood that a crime will be committed in the execution of the acts or omissions planned.''