Our authors

Our Books
More than 875 authors
from all continents

Historical Origins of International Criminal Law
Historical Origins of
International Criminal Law

pficl
Philosophical Foundations of
International Criminal Law

Policy Brief Series

pbs
Four-page briefs on policy challenges in international law

Quality Control
An online library

Our Chinese and Indian authors

li-singh
TOAEP has published more than 90 Chinese and Indian authors

atonement
Art and the ‘politics
of reconciliation’

Integrity in international justice
Online library on integrity in international justice

HomeIcon  FilmIcon  FilmIcon  CILRAP Circulation List TwitterTwitter PDFIcon

Element:

4. [Mental element for element 3] [Circumstance of context]: The perpetrator was aware that the conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.

According to the Nyiramasuhuko et al. Trial Chamber:

"Having regard to the organised nature of the attack and the fact it continued over two successive days; the Chamber finds that the assaillants intentionally killed members of the Tutsi ethnic group at Mugombwa Church. Further, in view of the large number of tutsi victims, the fact that Ndayambaje told the attackers that their work would be simple since the people in the church were all gathered together, and that some attackers left to continue searching for those still in hiding upon Ndayambaje's instructions, the Chamber finds that the assailants possessed genocidal intent during the attack and that Ndayambaje knew of this intent."[1]

The Nzaboninama Trial Chamber stated:

"The Chamber also finds that by threatening a Tutsi and saying that Tutsis should be massacred at Cyayi centre on 14 April 1994, Nzabonimana prompted others to act and to continue the genocidal attack upon the commune office, and that Nzabonimana intended to do so. There is no doubt that, at the time of Nzabonimana's prompting, he knew of the genocidal intent of his audience, particularly given the meeting's temporal and physical proximity to the recent attack on the commune office. Nzabonimana's knowledge of this specific intent is further demonstrated through his reminder to the attendees that their killing of Tutsis should take place before, rather than after, the taking of Tutsi property."[2]

"Nzabonimana was aware that he was orchestrating the release of people who had been imprisoned for killing Tutsis, and in light of the context, the Chamber concludes that Nzabonimana must have known of the genocidal intent of these killers."[3]

Lexsitus

Lexsitus logo

CILRAP Film
More than 555 films
freely and immediately available

CMN Knowledge Hub

CMN Knowledge Hub
Online services to help
your work and research

CILRAP Conversations

Our Books
CILRAP Conversations
on World Order

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

M.C. Bassiouni Justice Award

CILRAP Podcast

CILRAP Podcast

Our Books
An online library

Power in international justice
Online library on power in international justice

Interviewing
An online library